Lusk vs Caherciveen: which is better to live in? (2026)

Lusk (K45) and Caherciveen (V23) compared on price, safety, schools and quality of life.

The verdict
Caherciveen is the cheaper of the two — a median €300,000 against Lusk's €418,502 (40% lower). Caherciveen has the stronger safety score (66/100 vs 57/100); on the other facets the two are closely matched.

Lusk vs Caherciveen: common questions

Is Lusk cheaper than Caherciveen?
No. The median sale price in Lusk was €418,502 over the last 12 months, against €300,000 in Caherciveen (Property Price Register).
Is Lusk or Caherciveen safer?
Caherciveen scores higher on safety — 57/100 vs 66/100, based on Garda-division crime rates per 1,000 residents.
Which is better for buy-to-let, Lusk or Caherciveen?
Lusk has the stronger gross rental yield — 6.6% vs 5.2% — though net returns depend on price, condition and tenancy regulation.

Dig deeper

Related comparisons

Methodology

Sale prices, premiums and days-to-sale are computed from the Property Price Register (rolling 12 months) matched to original listing prices. Safety scores derive from Garda-division crime rates per 1,000 residents; education and profile figures from CSO census small-area data. The Quality of Life composite averages six equally-weighted dimensions built from 40+ metrics across 13 public datasets. Figures refresh daily; both areas are scoped to their Eircode routing key (K45 and V23).